A- de 1995
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Sanin Greiffenstein
✓Claimant Esperanza Espinosa Muñoz
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se decide negar por improcedente la solicitud de revocatoria directa, formulada contra la providencia que resolvió rechazar la demanda de la accionante referida, lo anterior, porque no interpuso el recurso de súplica argumentando que no se le notificó personalmente, no obstante, y teniendo en cuenta el Código de Procedimiento Civil la notificación del auto se realizó por medio de anotación en estados que elaboró Secretaría de la Corte Constitucional dando cumplimiento al debido proceso.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- decisiones juidiciales definitivas y la necesaria igualdad en el tratamiento que las autoridades públicas deben dar a todas las personas impiden, por otra parte, que se admitan para el presente caso los argumentos que expone la peticionaria.
- Por
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.